Model-theoretic grammar

From HandWiki

Model-theoretic grammars, also known as constraint-based grammars, contrast with generative grammars in the way they define sets of sentences: they state constraints on syntactic structure rather than providing operations for generating syntactic objects.Cite error: Closing </ref> missing for <ref> tag

Examples of model-theoretic grammars

The following is a sample of grammars falling under the model-theoretic umbrella:

Strengths

One benefit of model-theoretic grammars over generative grammars is that they allow for gradience in grammaticality. A structure may deviate only slightly from a theory or it may be highly deviant. Generative grammars, in contrast "entail a sharp boundary between the perfect and the nonexistent, and do not even permit gradience in ungrammaticality to be represented."[4]

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 Müller, Stefan (2016). Grammatical theory: From transformational grammar to constraint-based approaches. Berlin: Language Science Press. pp. 490–491. http://www.oapen.org/download?type=document&docid=611693. 
  2. Christiansen, Henning. "CHR Grammars with multiple constraint stores." First Workshop on Constraint Handling Rules: Selected Contributions. Universität Ulm, Fakultät für Informatik, 2004.
  3. Pullum, Geoffrey K.; Rogers, James (2008). "Expressive power of the syntactic theory implicit in the Cambridge Grammar of the English Language". Annual Meeting of the Linguistics Association of Great Britain: 1–16. http://www.lel.ed.ac.uk/~gpullum/EssexLAGB.pdf. 
  4. Pullum, Geoffrey K. (2013). "The Central Question in Comparative Syntactic Metatheory" (in en). Mind & Language 28 (4): 492–521. doi:10.1111/mila.12029.