Greenberger–Horne–Zeilinger state

From HandWiki
Short description: "Highly entangled" quantum state of 3 or more qubits


Generation of the 3-qubit GHZ state using quantum logic gates.

In physics, in the area of quantum information theory, a Greenberger–Horne–Zeilinger state (GHZ state) is a certain type of entangled quantum state that involves at least three subsystems (particle states, qubits, or qudits). The four-particle version was first studied by Daniel Greenberger, Michael Horne and Anton Zeilinger in 1989, and the three-particle version was introduced by N. David Mermin in 1990.[1][2][3] Extremely non-classical properties of the state have been observed. GHZ states for large numbers of qubits are theorized to give enhanced performance for metrology compared to other qubit superposition states.[4]

Definition

The GHZ state is an entangled quantum state for 3 qubits and its state is

[math]\displaystyle{ |\mathrm{GHZ}\rangle = \frac{|000\rangle + |111\rangle}{\sqrt{2}}. }[/math]

Generalization

The generalized GHZ state is an entangled quantum state of M > 2 subsystems. If each system has dimension [math]\displaystyle{ d }[/math], i.e., the local Hilbert space is isomorphic to [math]\displaystyle{ \mathbb{C}^d }[/math], then the total Hilbert space of an [math]\displaystyle{ M }[/math]-partite system is [math]\displaystyle{ \mathcal{H}_{\rm tot}=(\mathbb{C}^d)^{\otimes M} }[/math]. This GHZ state is also called an [math]\displaystyle{ M }[/math]-partite qudit GHZ state. Its formula as a tensor product is

[math]\displaystyle{ |\mathrm{GHZ}\rangle=\frac{1}{\sqrt{d}}\sum_{i=0}^{d-1}|i\rangle\otimes\cdots\otimes|i\rangle=\frac{1}{\sqrt{d}}(|0\rangle\otimes\cdots\otimes|0\rangle+\cdots+|d-1\rangle\otimes\cdots\otimes|d-1\rangle) }[/math].

In the case of each of the subsystems being two-dimensional, that is for a collection of M qubits, it reads

[math]\displaystyle{ |\mathrm{GHZ}\rangle = \frac{|0\rangle^{\otimes M} + |1\rangle^{\otimes M}}{\sqrt{2}}. }[/math]

Properties

There is no standard measure of multi-partite entanglement because different, not mutually convertible, types of multi-partite entanglement exist. Nonetheless, many measures define the GHZ state to be maximally entangled state.[citation needed]

Another important property of the GHZ state is that taking the partial trace over one of the three systems yields

[math]\displaystyle{ \operatorname{Tr}_3\left[\left(\frac{|000\rangle + |111\rangle}{\sqrt{2}}\right)\left(\frac{\langle 000|+\langle 111|}{\sqrt{2}}\right) \right] = \frac{(|00\rangle \langle 00| + |11\rangle \langle 11|)}{2}, }[/math]

which is an unentangled mixed state. It has certain two-particle (qubit) correlations, but these are of a classical nature. On the other hand, if we were to measure one of the subsystems in such a way that the measurement distinguishes between the states 0 and 1, we will leave behind either [math]\displaystyle{ |00\rangle }[/math] or [math]\displaystyle{ |11\rangle }[/math], which are unentangled pure states. This is unlike the W state, which leaves bipartite entanglements even when we measure one of its subsystems.[citation needed]

The GHZ state is non-biseparable[5] and is the representative of one of the two non-biseparable classes of 3-qubit states which cannot be transformed (not even probabilistically) into each other by local quantum operations, the other being the W state, [math]\displaystyle{ |\mathrm{W}\rangle = (|001\rangle + |010\rangle + |100\rangle)/\sqrt{3} }[/math].[6] Thus [math]\displaystyle{ |\mathrm{GHZ}\rangle }[/math] and [math]\displaystyle{ |\mathrm{W}\rangle }[/math] represent two very different kinds of entanglement for three or more particles.[7] The W state is, in a certain sense "less entangled" than the GHZ state; however, that entanglement is, in a sense, more robust against single-particle measurements, in that, for an N-qubit W state, an entangled (N − 1)-qubit state remains after a single-particle measurement. By contrast, certain measurements on the GHZ state collapse it into a mixture or a pure state.

The GHZ state leads to striking non-classical correlations (1989). Particles prepared in this state lead to a version of Bell's theorem, which shows the internal inconsistency of the notion of elements-of-reality introduced in the famous Einstein–Podolsky–Rosen article. The first laboratory observation of GHZ correlations was by the group of Anton Zeilinger (1998), who was awarded a share of the 2022 Nobel Prize in physics for this work.[8] Many more accurate observations followed. The correlations can be utilized in some quantum information tasks. These include multipartner quantum cryptography (1998) and communication complexity tasks (1997, 2004).

Pairwise entanglement

Although a measurement of the third particle of the GHZ state that distinguishes the two states results in an unentangled pair, a measurement along an orthogonal direction can leave behind a maximally entangled Bell state. This is illustrated below.

The 3-qubit GHZ state can be written as

[math]\displaystyle{ |\mathrm{GHZ}\rangle=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\left(|000\rangle + |111\rangle\right) = \frac{1}{2}\left(|00\rangle + |11\rangle \right) \otimes |+\rangle + \frac{1}{2}\left(|00\rangle - |11\rangle\right) \otimes |-\rangle, }[/math]

where the third particle is written as a superposition in the X basis (as opposed to the Z basis) as [math]\displaystyle{ |0\rangle = (|+\rangle + |-\rangle)/\sqrt{2} }[/math] and [math]\displaystyle{ |1\rangle =( |+\rangle - |-\rangle)/\sqrt{2} }[/math].

A measurement of the GHZ state along the X basis for the third particle then yields either [math]\displaystyle{ |\Phi^+\rangle =(|00\rangle + |11\rangle)/\sqrt{2} }[/math], if [math]\displaystyle{ |+\rangle }[/math] was measured, or [math]\displaystyle{ |\Phi^-\rangle=(|00\rangle - |11\rangle)/\sqrt{2} }[/math], if [math]\displaystyle{ |-\rangle }[/math] was measured. In the later case, the phase can be rotated by applying a Z quantum gate to give [math]\displaystyle{ |\Phi^+\rangle }[/math], while in the former case, no additional transformations are applied. In either case, the result of the operations is a maximally entangled Bell state.

This example illustrates that, depending on which measurement is made of the GHZ state is more subtle than it first appears: a measurement along an orthogonal direction, followed by a quantum transform that depends on the measurement outcome, can leave behind a maximally entangled state.

Applications

GHZ states are used in several protocols in quantum communication and cryptography, for example, in secret sharing[9] or in the quantum Byzantine agreement.

See also

References

  1. Greenberger, Daniel M.; Horne, Michael A.; Zeilinger, Anton (1989). "Going beyond Bell's Theorem". in Kafatos, M.. Bell's Theorem, Quantum Theory and Conceptions of the Universe. Dordrecht: Kluwer. p. 69. Bibcode2007arXiv0712.0921G. 
  2. Mermin, N. David (1990-08-01). "Quantum mysteries revisited". American Journal of Physics 58 (8): 731–734. doi:10.1119/1.16503. ISSN 0002-9505. Bibcode1990AmJPh..58..731M. 
  3. Caves, Carlton M.; Fuchs, Christopher A.; Schack, Rüdiger (2002-08-20). "Unknown quantum states: The quantum de Finetti representation". Journal of Mathematical Physics 43 (9): 4537–4559. doi:10.1063/1.1494475. ISSN 0022-2488. Bibcode2002JMP....43.4537C. "Mermin was the first to point out the interesting properties of this three-system state, following the lead of D. M. Greenberger, M. Horne, and A. Zeilinger [...] where a similar four-system state was proposed.". 
  4. Eldredge, Zachary; Foss-Feig, Michael; Gross, Jonathan A.; Rolston, S. L.; Gorshkov, Alexey V. (2018-04-23). "Optimal and secure measurement protocols for quantum sensor networks". Physical Review A 97 (4): 042337. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.97.042337. PMID 31093589. Bibcode2018PhRvA..97d2337E. 
  5. A pure state [math]\displaystyle{ |\psi\rangle }[/math] of [math]\displaystyle{ N }[/math] parties is called biseparable, if one can find a partition of the parties in two nonempty disjoint subsets [math]\displaystyle{ A }[/math] and [math]\displaystyle{ B }[/math] with [math]\displaystyle{ A \cup B = \{1,\dots,N\} }[/math] such that [math]\displaystyle{ |\psi\rangle = |\phi\rangle_A \otimes |\gamma\rangle_B }[/math], i.e. [math]\displaystyle{ |\psi\rangle }[/math] is a product state with respect to the partition [math]\displaystyle{ A|B }[/math].
  6. W. Dür; G. Vidal; J. I. Cirac (2000). "Three qubits can be entangled in two inequivalent ways". Phys. Rev. A 62 (6): 062314. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.62.062314. Bibcode2000PhRvA..62f2314D. 
  7. Piotr Migdał; Javier Rodriguez-Laguna; Maciej Lewenstein (2013), "Entanglement classes of permutation-symmetric qudit states: Symmetric operations suffice", Physical Review A 88 (1): 012335, doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.88.012335, Bibcode2013PhRvA..88a2335M 
  8. "Scientific Background on the Nobel Prize in Physics 2022". 4 October 2022. https://www.nobelprize.org/uploads/2022/10/advanced-physicsprize2022.pdf. 
  9. Mark Hillery; Vladimír Bužek; André Berthiaume (1998), "Quantum secret sharing", Physical Review A 59 (3): 1829–1834, doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.59.1829, Bibcode1999PhRvA..59.1829H