Algebra extension

From HandWiki
Short description: Surjective ring homomorphism with a given codomain


In abstract algebra, an algebra extension is the ring-theoretic equivalent of a group extension.

Precisely, a ring extension of a ring R by an abelian group I is a pair (E, [math]\displaystyle{ \phi }[/math]) consisting of a ring E and a ring homomorphism [math]\displaystyle{ \phi }[/math] that fits into the short exact sequence of abelian groups:

[math]\displaystyle{ 0 \to I \to E \overset{\phi}{{}\to{}} R \to 0. }[/math][1]

This makes I isomorphic to a two-sided ideal of E.

Given a commutative ring A, an A-extension or an extension of an A-algebra is defined in the same way by replacing "ring" with "algebra over A" and "abelian groups" with "A-modules".

An extension is said to be trivial or to split if [math]\displaystyle{ \phi }[/math] splits; i.e., [math]\displaystyle{ \phi }[/math] admits a section that is a ring homomorphism[2] (see § Example: trivial extension).

A morphism between extensions of R by I, over say A, is an algebra homomorphism EE' that induces the identities on I and R. By the five lemma, such a morphism is necessarily an isomorphism, and so two extensions are equivalent if there is a morphism between them.

Trivial extension example

Let R be a commutative ring and M an R-module. Let E = RM be the direct sum of abelian groups. Define the multiplication on E by

[math]\displaystyle{ (a, x) \cdot (b, y) = (ab, ay + bx). }[/math]

Note that identifying (a, x) with a + εx where ε squares to zero and expanding out (a + εx)(b + εy) yields the above formula; in particular we see that E is a ring. It is sometimes called the algebra of dual numbers. Alternatively, E can be defined as [math]\displaystyle{ \operatorname{Sym}(M)/\bigoplus_{n \ge 2} \operatorname{Sym}^n(M) }[/math] where [math]\displaystyle{ \operatorname{Sym}(M) }[/math] is the symmetric algebra of M.[3] We then have the short exact sequence

[math]\displaystyle{ 0 \to M \to E \overset{p}{{}\to{}} R \to 0 }[/math]

where p is the projection. Hence, E is an extension of R by M. It is trivial since [math]\displaystyle{ r \mapsto (r, 0) }[/math] is a section (note this section is a ring homomorphism since [math]\displaystyle{ (1, 0) }[/math] is the multiplicative identity of E). Conversely, every trivial extension E of R by I is isomorphic to [math]\displaystyle{ R \oplus I }[/math] if [math]\displaystyle{ I^2 = 0 }[/math]. Indeed, identifying [math]\displaystyle{ R }[/math] as a subring of E using a section, we have [math]\displaystyle{ (E, \phi) \simeq (R \oplus I, p) }[/math] via [math]\displaystyle{ e \mapsto (\phi(e), e - \phi(e)) }[/math].[1]

One interesting feature of this construction is that the module M becomes an ideal of some new ring. In his book Local Rings, Nagata calls this process the principle of idealization.[4]

Square-zero extension

Especially in deformation theory, it is common to consider an extension R of a ring (commutative or not) by an ideal whose square is zero. Such an extension is called a square-zero extension, a square extension or just an extension. For a square-zero ideal I, since I is contained in the left and right annihilators of itself, I is a [math]\displaystyle{ R/I }[/math]-bimodule.

More generally, an extension by a nilpotent ideal is called a nilpotent extension. For example, the quotient [math]\displaystyle{ R \to R_{\mathrm{red}} }[/math] of a Noetherian commutative ring by the nilradical is a nilpotent extension.

In general,

[math]\displaystyle{ 0 \to I^n/I^{n-1} \to R/I^{n-1} \to R/I^n \to 0 }[/math]

is a square-zero extension. Thus, a nilpotent extension breaks up into successive square-zero extensions. Because of this, it is usually enough to study square-zero extensions in order to understand nilpotent extensions.

See also

  • Formally smooth map
  • The Wedderburn principal theorem, a statement about an extension by the Jacobson radical.

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 Sernesi 2007, 1.1.1.
  2. Typical references require sections be homomorphisms without elaborating whether 1 is preserved. But since we need to be able to identify R as a subring of E (see the trivial extension example), it seems 1 needs to be preserved.
  3. Anderson, D. D.; Winders, M. (March 2009). "Idealization of a Module". Journal of Commutative Algebra 1 (1): 3–56. doi:10.1216/JCA-2009-1-1-3. ISSN 1939-2346. https://projecteuclid.org/journals/journal-of-commutative-algebra/volume-1/issue-1/Idealization-of-a-Module/10.1216/JCA-2009-1-1-3.full. 
  4. Nagata, Masayoshi (1962), Local Rings, Interscience Tracts in Pure and Applied Mathematics, 13, New York-London: Interscience Publishers a division of John Wiley & Sons, ISBN 0-88275-228-6 

Further reading